Updated: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 01:00:00 GMT

Is the Government to blame for falling savings rates?

Is the Government to blame for falling savings rates?


Is the Government to blame for falling savings rates?

Is the Government to blame for falling savings rates?

Savings rates are plummeting and a new Government scheme could be to blame.

The rates on savings accounts have been falling for quite some time now, making it pretty much impossible to get a good return on your cash.

With inflation sailing around the 2.5% mark for a while (though it fell this week to 2.2%) and the base rate at a record low, there aren’t many places where you can find a good savings account.

Add to that, when you do find a decent rate, there’s no guarantee it’ll be around for long as many accounts, particularly those in the instant access market, have steadily cut the interest rate they pay.

Why are rates so low?

Along with the pretty dire state of the economy, high inflation and a low base rate, the Government’s Funding for Lending (FFL) scheme has come under fire as one reason savers are getting such poor returns.

Over the past year the financial crisis and problems in the eurozone have made it hard for banks to access money on open markets. This has led to a tightening in conditions and criteria for banks dishing out loans such as mortgages.

To combat the problem the FFL programme has been designed to provide a much-needed boost by making cheaper loans available to both businesses and individuals.

It’s run by The Bank of England and allows banks to borrow the equivalent of up to 5% of their loan books, and this could rise in the future. Right now 13 companies have signed up, including Barclays, Santander and RBS. When The Bank of England next releases a list of companies at the end of October, it's expected more will have joined.

Plummeting savings rates

As the banks now have the opportunity to borrow at a cheaper rate from the Government, there is less need for them to get their cash from savings customers. And that’s why rates being offered are a lot less competitive now than they were even a few months ago.

[SPOTLIGHT]Rachel Springall, spokesperson for Moneyfacts, said banks appear to be losing interest in attracting deposits from savers recently, perhaps due to the fact that they can get cheaper funds from the Government via its FFL scheme.

The Bank of England wasn't able to confirm this. Rob Elder, spokesperson for the BoE, told me that by reducing funding costs, the FFL scheme should allow banks to increase lending to UK households and firms. This should boost spending in the economy, and so help to create jobs and raise incomes.

Financial institutions are also being quiet on the issue and many, such as Nationwide, categorises the FFL as an ‘industry issue’ and therefore doesn't comment on it.

However, Nicola Hussey, spokesperson for Santander, explained that retail deposits still remained key in the bank’s funding and as FFL was only 5% of an institution’s total assets, it hadn’t acted to reduce rates on instant access savings accounts.

“We constantly review our savings range in line with market conditions and competitor movements to ensure we remain competitive," she aded.

How have rates changed?

Instant access account rates have been tumbling for a while and in October the average rate was 1.04% compared to 1.07% in July.

Rates on fixed rate accounts are also creeping downwards and this table demonstrates how much they’ve dropped since July.

Month (2012)*

1-year bond

2-year bond

3-year bond

4-year bond

5-year bond

July

2.70%

3.34%

3.39%

3.73%

3.88%

August

2.77%

3.29%

3.34%

3.69%

3.79%

September

2.64%

3.17%

3.26%

3.64%

3.73%

October

2357%

3.01%

3.08%

3.33%

3.58%

*source:Moneyfacts

What’s the best rate right now?

If you are hunting for a place for your savings, the market isn’t positive. But there are still good accounts to be found which will pay you more than keeping the money in your current account.

For example, in the instant access market, Nationwide is a decent bet with its MySave Online Plus account paying 2.75% on anything over £1,000, though you can only take one penalty-free withdrawal in the year.

Derbyshire Building Society pays out the same amount and also requires £1,000 but you have total flexibility when it comes to deposits and withdrawals. If you don’t want this much money in an instant access account, Principality’s offering - which pays a higher rate or 2.85% - can be opened with £1.

More on savings:

Compare savings accounts

The top alternatives to ING/Barclays

M&S Bank offers regular saver account paying 6%

The top fixed rate savings bonds

7Comments
avatar
Of course the government are to blame for the drastic reduction in savings !!! We can barely afford to live let alone save...... these people are all arrogant , rich posh boys and girls, who don't have a clue how ordinary individuals live. You can't call 0.5 % a worthwhile interest rate an incentive to save !! Get real !!!
23/10/2012 14:00
avatar
Note to No 10 & 11 ................most would ask, just what the heck are savings!!!!!??????
avatar

hold let me get this right according to the bank of england the FFL scheme is designed to to offer banks cheap loans at a rate of 0.225%  to offer it onto its custumers either as personal loans at ave.5.5%-7.9% or as a morgage ave 2.5%-7% depending on morgage type.

two problems i have with this the lenders massive profit margin and also the idea that the governments solution to the economic problems we face now is to encourage people to get further into debt.have they not lernt anything the last three years!!!

people should stop borrowing anything until ALL there debts have been repayed.if you cant pay for it save up until you can.dont put your money into banks either not until the interest they offer is at least above inflation(may as well hide it in your sock drawer) if nobody either borrowed nor loaned anything banks would then start thinking about putting its customers first an treat them with a little respect .

24/03/2013 20:06
avatar

Was it not the same Mr Osborne who while in opposition said that an economy built on borrowed money is living on borrowed time?  He was right, so why the hell is he trying to encourange lending when everyone now knows the dangers of borrowing?   We need a big hike in savings rates to get people with money spending again.  The interest I have lost over the last 5 years due to low rates is money I would have spent.

18/01/2013 21:42
avatar
THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT TO BLAME

Its the banks.

Banks control governments, politicians and populations.

In the 'good' times they make you borrow borrow borrow 

In the 'bad' times they recall debt, foreclose on mortgages and restrict the flow of money.
This in turn lets them and their lackies, the politicians, erode peoples rights, get greater control of the population and deregulate markets so corporations and banks can feast on the easy pickings.

Technically its called the 'business cycle,    in reality its corporate greed and capitalist evil !!!!

TIME FOR CHANGE 
avatar

 

 

What a bunch of idle, ignorant, whinning ingrates

 

What you're saying is - give us money for nothing. We want security, a guaranteed return and rates well above inflation - and we want it whilst we sit on our lazy arses.

 

 If you want to see a return - go and invest it in a new start up company -SEIS tax free incentives

 

help create new businesses and bypass the banks.

 

 

 

 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

latest money videos

10 reasons to make MSN UK your homepage (© Microsoft)

more on msn money

msn money poll

What current account benefit would you like more of/value the most?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

  1.  
    32 %
    Medical/life insurance
    327 votes
  2.  
    9 %
    Travel insurance
    90 votes
  3.  
    5 %
    Breakdown cover
    50 votes
  4.  
    4 %
    Legal aid
    44 votes
  5.  
    3 %
    Tickets for cultural or sporting events
    29 votes
  6.  
    47 %
    Lower charges
    483 votes

Total Responses: 1,023
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.