Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:15:17 GMT | By Cliff D'Arcy, writing for MSN Money

Is your council tax set to soar?

With £54 billion missing from council pension schemes, brace yourself for higher taxes.


Demonstrators in central London take part in a protest against the UK government's plans for pension reform earlier this year. (© Image © Steffan Rousseau – PA Wire)

Burgeoning pension fund deficits could trigger a sharp hike in council tax bills, a tax organisation has warned.

Councils across the UK have a combined pension deficit of more than £54 billion in 2010/11, according to new research from The TaxPayers' Alliance (TPA).

Put another way, the UK's 101 local authority pension funds have total liabilities calculated at £186.6 billion and total assets worth £132.4 billion.

This difference represents a huge 'black hole' at the heart of the Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS).

Your share could be £1,125
To put this £54 billion shortfall into context, it averages out at £1,125 for each of the UK's 48 million adults. Ultimately, taxpayers will be held liable for this deficit, so we could be facing some steep increases in our council tax bills, plus other local taxes such as parking charges and fines.

In previous research, TPA estimated that a fifth (20%) of all council tax is spent on funding employer contributions to the LGPS. In other words, if your council tax bill this year is £1,500, then around £300 of this goes towards topping up your local council's sickly pension scheme.

As a result, TPA argues that the LGPS is "much more generous than most private-sector pensions and is in urgent need of reform."

The only good news is that this huge deficit fell from £91 billion in 2009/10 to £54 billion in 2010/11, largely thanks to a sharp recovery in share prices. Then again, this is still £3 billion more than the £51 billion shortfall recorded in 2008/09, so things have got worse instead of better since the recession.

10 councils with big 'black holes'
According to TPA figures, these 10 councils had the largest pension deficits in 2010/11.

 
CouncilDeficit (£m)Funding levelDeficit per person
Birmingham£1,34067%£1,292
Durham£72863%£1,424
Hampshire£71864%£554
Leeds£65075%£814
Essex£63367%£448
Lancashire£62973%£538
Glasgow£62579%£1,054
Brent£58242%£2,267
Staffordshire£56866%£684
Sheffield£56370%£1,014

As you can see, Birmingham has the biggest pension shortfall, weighing in at a hefty £1.34 billion, or £1,292 for each of its 1,037,000 citizens. Durham has the second-highest black hole, at £728 million (£1,424 per head). In third place is Hampshire, with a deficit of £718 million, which comes to £554 per head.

Another problem is that some pension funds are much better funded than others. The average funding level for all LGPS plans is 70% of their liabilities.

However, of the top 20 councils, three have assets worth less than three-fifths (60%) of their liabilities. These are Brent (London), with a funding level of 42%, Rhondda Cynon Taff in Wales at 53% and Welsh capital Cardiff, with a 58% funding level.

In total, TPA identified 26 councils with funding levels below this critical 60% level. Brent was the worst by far, but other councils with pension-funding problems include Merthyr Tydfil, South Wales (50%), Craven, North Yorkshire (52%), Worthing, West Sussex (52%) and Havering, London (55%).

The biggest bills per head
TPA also identified those councils with the highest pension shortfalls per head of population. These are the 'top 10' in this category.

CouncilDeficit (£m)Funding levelDeficit per person
Merthyr Tydfil£12650%£2,268
Brent£58242%£2,267
Rhondda Cynon Taff£48353%£2,063
Gateshead£39162%£2,040
Neath, Port Talbot£27559%£2,001
Hackney£42361%£1,931
Hammersmith and Fulham£32259%£1,899
Newham£41361%£1,718
Blaenau, Gwent£11765%£1,708
Lambeth£47261%£1,660

Merthyr Tydfil has a shocking pension problem, with a deficit amounting to £2,268 per head, which is more than double the £1,125 average I calculated above. Brent is just behind on £2,267 per head and Rhondda, Cynon, Taff takes third place with a deficit per person of £2,063.

While London and Wales dominate the list above, the situation looks bleak across the country.

This is a problem for every household paying council tax throughout the UK. Indeed, every one of the 434 councils in this survey - from Aberdeen City to York - has a pension deficit, although it's a tiny £3 per head at the Greater London Authority and in Chichester, West Sussex.

Pension promises we can't keep?
Frankly, I find this survey to be deeply disturbing. Clearly, councils with huge pension black holes will have to fill them somehow - and this burden will fall on ordinary taxpayers. However, with Brits struggling to pay their own household bills and pension contributions, it's a bit much to ask them to fork out an average £1,225 extra per person towards sorting out council pensions, too.

Hence, Matthew Sinclair, director of the TaxPayers' Alliance, is calling on the government to reform pensions urgently.

"The deficit in the Local Government Pension Scheme remains a ticking time-bomb that's being left for future generations of taxpayers to deal with," said Sinclair. "With an ageing population and a crisis in the public finances, generous final-salary schemes like the LGPS are inflexible and too expensive, and need urgent reform.

"Councils should not take false comfort in the improvement in the stock market. Their pension liabilities continue to far outweigh their assets and the situation remains worse than two years ago."

In summary, unless councils take action to increase employee pension contributions, freeze current entitlements, reduce future payouts and increase their retirement age to 65, then taxpayers could be clobbered with yet more rounds of steep rises in council tax.

This will not be a welcome move, especially as many councils have already ignored the call by Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Eric Pickles, to freeze council tax in 2012/13.

Want to know how big your share of this problem is? Then find your local council in the full report from The TaxPayers' Alliance.

16Comments
16/04/2012 16:39
avatar

I am not sure why Dunoon is blaming the Tories as this problem has built up over the last 10 years or more mostly under under a Labour government.

The problem remains however and needs to be addressed, we can no longer afford  final salary pensions, and all workers in both the public and private sector have to accept that they will have to pay more for longer and receive less (this includes teachers )

The taxpayers of this country can not be expected to bail out poorly run (predominantly Labour councils ) forever

16/04/2012 16:43
avatar
To Lawrence duff - It's not this government that has caused the problem - blame the previous government and the unions - if we didn't have to pay towards public employees pensions we would be a lot better off.  We will also be better off if you scots get your independence and we won't have to be subjected your MP's in Parliament.  It would also be better if councils did not have savings in other countries - remember Iceland - if each council used the money they collected in council tax to fund services and not pay for union reps that although they work for the councils spend their days doing union work.  If you want to work for a union then the union should pay and you shouldn't be employed by councils.  Let's see how you half witted lot get on if you gain your independence and have to rely solely on your own funding - this should save a lot more for English councils.
16/04/2012 19:28
avatar

So let's get this right. I've paid into my own private pension ever since I started earning, which is 36 years. Every penny of that is to ensure I get a decent pension to live off when I retire.

Now you're telling me that I have to endure ANOTHER rip-off just to ensure somebody ELSE gets a decent pension????

FFS, never mind Guy Fawkes. Give me some fertilizer.........

avatar
This is NOT a load of rubbish - for years it has been obvious that the excessively generous public-sector pension scheme will eventually need a massive bail-out.  These schemes were a failure from the start and we (the taxpayers) will have to pick up the bill.  Are you aware that for a number of years, council tax has included at least a 10% extra charge to reduce this disgraceful black hole.  The only solution is to freeze all public sector pension funds and calculate what they can pay based on their actual value. Going forward, public sector workers should be subject to "money purchase" pension schemes which are NOT subsidised by taxpayers.  The only people who are calling this rubbish are, guess what, public sector workers!!!
16/04/2012 18:45
avatar

Whilst I agree with the Taxpayers Alliance highlighting the deficit issue,I cannot agree with the remedy that they propose.

ALL pensions,public or private,nust be funded by the employer\employee 100%, NOT the taxpayer,I think that any reasonable person can agree with that.

What they are proposing though,is to 'freeze' existing pension payments at current levels,in other words,let the real value of existing pensioners pensions,be devalued.

That is criminal dishonesty,it is a parallel  situation to other state benefits,whereby they are upgraded by the CPI,rather than RPI,but this is much worse,it is a standstill proposal & is criminally dishonest.

 

The issue has to be looked at from the perspective of New Labour's period in office,back in 1997,they rewarded their election victory over the Tories,by awarding huge UNPAID FOR salary increases to the union dominated public sector,that is to say, THE PAYMASTERS OF NEW LABOUR.

Those increases have never been paid for,unsurprisingly perhaps, the adjustments necessary from those increases,have never been made in any of Gordon BROWN's budgets.

 

THAT IS WHERE THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM LIES,MAKE THE PUBLIC SECTOR PAY FOR THOSE INCREASES-NOT THE TAXPAYERS,NOR THE EXISTING PENSIONERS.

avatar
why do peaple continue to blame the political parties for this mess ,  why not look at another option ,think back to the endowment mortgage fiasco . then the ppi fiasco and who was behind them ,how many more times are the public going allow themselves to be conned by the insurence companies , they promise allsorts tp get you to part with your money and get you to tie it up for years to get the best payout  and low and behold when the time comes its the same old story ,oh the shares arent very good and the returns arnt what we expected so you will not get what we promised , but hey its ok becouse we still got are big wages ane bonus so its not all bad , any way there is a way we can solve this we will increase the premiums for everyone  problem solved
avatar

When, on average, 20% of all council tax collected goes on public sector pensions, then surely it is time to do something about the situation.

 I could understand the public sector being paid a decent pension years ago, when as a reward for job security & a pension at the end, they had a working life with substantially less pay than people in the private sector. But wage rises over recent years have put public sector workers on at least the same wage as their private sector counterparts, & in some cases even higher.

It's time that many of theses public employees were made to realise what life is like in the real world, & if they have a problem with that, i'm sure there are many people who would be happy to step into their jobs.

 

16/04/2012 16:22
avatar
Don't believe this nonsense!

According to the report, they only measured assets versus liabilities. Meaning, if those that we borrowed money from came knocking and asked for every single penny back now we wouldn't be able to pay it. They call this an Acid Test Ratio.

However, what they conveniently leave out is how much revenue is actually being taken in by councils. If you want to measure deficit accurately then you need to use this. The notion that a creditor would turn up and ask for all their money back at that one point is unheard of in the real world.
19/04/2012 10:54
avatar
An ex-council worker I  know was made redundant a few years ago, and had reached the age when he could receive a pension for the years worked (30+). What's more, he receives an annual increase on his pension, which is more than I or many ordinary workers have done for years in their wages. Apparently, this is a legal requirement of the pension. He runs a large house, a car, goes on regular holidays, and moreover, is able to go to the local pub most nights of the week. Basically, he's very comfortable indeed, and , excluding his insufferable smugness, I think it's fair that he should enjoy the rewards of the pension he's paid into for all his working life, but ordinary struggling workers, especially in these straitened times, shouldn't be expected to maintain comfortable lifestyles for others when their own standard of living is so low.
03/05/2012 09:18
avatar
you english voted for this government ,how dense are you

WHY OH WHY DO PEOPLE KEEP SAYING THIS TRIPE?????   

NO-ONE VOTED THIS GOVERNMENT IN - THE TORIES & LIBS HAD TO COBBLE THEIR PALTRY VOTES TOGETHER TO GET INTO POWER!!

19/04/2012 19:25
avatar
He gets to a boozer most nights? Is there still one open? Up here, it's like the specials song.....ghost town. There are no pubs/clubs.....all gone. All we've got is a grey multi-storey car park. The highlight of the week is when someone throws themselves off it.
16/04/2012 19:02
avatar

I wonder if DUNOON is one of those who pray for independence for the Scots?

 

If so,they can happily take their pension liabilities with them.

 

While we are at it,HS2 the high speed rail link,could also be classed as an exit route for all the immigrants residing in Scotland,to escape to England,once the Scottish money runs out, in double quick time.

 

Maybe Westminster ought to 'Scotch' that one,by disallowing any resettlement to England,BEFORE IT ACTUALLY HAPPENS-AS IT WILL.

03/05/2012 09:08
avatar
why do peaple continue to blame the political parties for this mess

Because the government allow the companies you mention to RIP EVERYONE OFF!!!  THEY ARE ALL IN IT TOGETHER - DONT YOU GET THAT????????????

03/05/2012 09:04
avatar
Burgeoning pension fund deficits could trigger a sharp hike in council tax bills

Thats their stinking lying excuse and they are sticking to it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


REVOLUTION IS THE ONLY SOLUTION

16/04/2012 17:10
avatar
Don't believe this load of rubbish  the only reason council tax is rising is because the government has reduced funding to councils and it doesn't matter which party is in power they are all crap  and too busy blaming the last ones in power instead of trying to sort the country out 
16/04/2012 17:05
avatar
Rubbish!! pensions has been on decline since the 1980s the tory years,its always easy blaming the last government and jumping on the gravy train themselves,id bet THERE pensions is wrapped in gold.PARASITES and BUMWIPES all of um.Council tax was gonna rise in anycase,theyve got to blame something.This is just the tip of the iceberg with the tories,just wait and see.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

latest money videos

10 reasons to make MSN UK your homepage (© Microsoft)

more on msn money

msn money poll

When did you last switch your current account?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

  1.  
    5 %
    In the last six months
    74 votes
  2.  
    4 %
    In the last year
    52 votes
  3.  
    5 %
    In the last two years
    68 votes
  4.  
    3 %
    In the last three years
    45 votes
  5.  
    10 %
    In the last five years
    154 votes
  6. 73 %
    I have never switched current accounts
    1,080 votes

Total Responses: 1,473
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.