Updated: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 01:00:00 GMT | By lovemoney.com

Why the experts are wrong about house prices

Property pundits predict higher home values in 2013, but there are a number of hurdles standing in their way.

Why the experts are wrong about house prices

Why the experts are wrong about house prices

With £4 trillion of the UK's total personal wealth of £7 trillion invested in property, it's hardly surprising that future house prices remain a British obsession.

As happens every year, property firms -- including estate agents, mortgage lenders and property websites -- have released their end-of-year predictions for where prices will go in 2013. Many pundits expect prices to rise slightly this year, but not by much.

For example, property website Rightmove reckons that prices will rise by an average of 2%, with growth strongest in London and the south east. Halifax, one of the UK's largest mortgage lenders, expects prices to be broadly flat and unlikely to rise more than 2%.

Fragile forecasts

However, we should take any such predictions with a hefty pinch of salt. This is because property pundits have a dreadful record of forecasting the future direction of house prices, as What 2012 has in store for house prices demonstrates.

Also, I believe that, by their very nature, property-related firms have a natural corporate bias towards promoting higher home values. They are cheerleaders for higher property prices, rather than dispassionate reporters on this vital economic trend.

I expect UK house prices to continue to weaken into 2013 and beyond. Here are seven solid reasons for my pessimism:

1. A slump in transactions

In 2006, a record 1.7 million homes changed hands in the UK. In 2007, the number of transactions slipped to 1.6 million, before falling off a cliff to 901,000 in 2008 as the credit crunch took hold.

Since 2009, the number of sales has not reached 900,000 in any calendar year, so transactions are running at roughly half of their peak. This is one important indicator that the UK housing market is still far from healthy.

2. No more risky mortgages

Before the long-overdue property crash arrived in the summer of 2007, lenders were scrambling to lend to anyone with a pulse. This lax lending resulted in crazy home loans such as the 125% and 130% mortgages that helped to sink Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley.

Today, it's almost impossible to borrow even 100% of a property's valuation, as buying a home usually requires a substantial deposit. What's more, the Bank of England warned banks on Monday that they will have to put aside extra capital when lending to riskier homebuyers. This extra regulation will reduce the risk of another banking crisis by cooling down future credit and housing booms.

3. High personal debt

During the 'credit mania' of the Nineties and Noughties, UK personal debt (including mortgages) exploded from under £500 billion in mid-1997 to nearly £1.5 trillion by 2008.

This near-tripling of personal debt in a single decade has left the UK with a horrible hangover today. With personal debt now averaging close to £58,000 per household, we are in no position to start another credit-fuelled surge in house prices.

4. Weak wage growth

Fundamentally, house prices rely on earnings, because buyers need incomes to service their property debts. The bad news is that UK wage growth has been very weak since our economy started sliding in 2008. In fact, average earnings fell slightly in 2009 and, since then, have failed to keep pace with the ever-rising cost of living.

For instance, in the year to October 2012, total UK pay rose by a mere 1.3%, which is well below what is needed to maintain living standards. As a result, UK wages have not kept up with price rises since our economy went into reverse in 2008.

5. Inflation stays stubbornly above target

Inflation is a measure of the rising cost of living, usually expressed as a percentage over a previous 12-month period. The Bank of England has a target to keep inflation at or below 2% a year, as measured by the Consumer Prices Index (CPI).

Alas, by keeping its base rate at a historic low of 0.5% a year since March 2009, the Bank has contributed to inflation stubbornly staying above 2%. In fact, CPI inflation has remained above target in every month since December 2009 and stood at 2.7% in December.

These unexpectedly high rises in the cost of living put severe pressure on disposable incomes, leaving less money to spend on mortgage repayments and, ultimately, homes.

6. Interest rates are artificially low

The single biggest prop supporting house prices is the incredibly low interest rates currently on offer to new homebuyers and existing homeowners.

Thanks to the Bank of England's base rate sticking at 0.5% a year (the lowest since the Bank was founded in 1694), mortgage rates are well below historic norms. In addition, the launch of the Funding for Lending scheme in July 2012 has provided banks and other lenders with a flood of cheap cash to lend on. As a result, mortgage rates continue to plumb new depths.

While a rise in base rate this year looks unlikely, interest rates must go up eventually. This is sure to happen when fed-up bond investors force up the yields on gilts (UK government bonds) as our national finances worsen. When interest rates finally do start rising, we can expect utter carnage in the housing market.

7. Rising taxes and falling benefits

Finally, our ability to buy homes and meet mortgage repayments very much depends on disposable incomes, which are under pressure like never before. In recent history, the squeeze on take-home pay has been worse than at any time since 1921.

Rising tax bills and cutbacks to state benefits are set to hit incomes hard later this year. Through a process known as 'fiscal drag', millions more taxpayers are being dragged into higher tax bands. The withdrawal of Child Benefit from high earners and a 1% cap on many state benefits will heap more pressure on already-stretched household budgets.

More on property:

How house prices changed around the world in 2012

What 2013 has in store for house prices

What's the 'right' price of your house?

How rows with your neighbours could hurt your house price

What's your property worth?


Most of these property 'pundits' also have a vested interest in predicting property price rises.


If the person making the prediction is in any way connected with the property market (estate agent, mortgage lender, property advertising or similar) ignore anything they say.


Some of the worst offenders seem to be the writers who do pieces to pad out local newspaper property supplements. If you believe some of them there has never been a slumo.

25/01/2013 14:49
Why is it the rise in house prices are always reported as a good thing??  It's the cost of housing which drives up the cost of living through the roof..  Higher wage demands, higher production costs and the loss of work to companies abroad, and factories closing down isn't good for the economy..  The only beneficiaries appear to be the bankers, investors, solicitors, estate agents and the building societies..  In other words only the rich benefit  yet again..The general population and business would benefit from low housing costs..  If we had a stable housing market with little change it would be of benefit the whole of society..  These so called experts which promote a buoyant and what they call healthy housing market are the representatives of the greedy who want to make a profit at every householders expense, who have in-bedded themselves into the media to promote a greedy damaging agenda... Housing is too important to leave to a free market..  We need draconian measures to protect housing from the greedy...
21/01/2013 02:19
Government and greedy banks are preventing first time buyers from buying a home they can actually afford a mortgage on.  The greedy, self preserving banks have went from one extreme trying to squeeze as much money from customers as they could, to denying the loans that working people need and this government is too scared of the banks (or they don't want to upset their friends who are share holders) to do anything about it.
26/01/2013 17:20
It does not how much people say the house prices are falling. The truth is the house prices have been rising since the eighties so fast for greed by usual suspects. The simplest and moral way to solve the Housing, NHS,and Country problems is to look after the people from the bottom upwards, Not the other way around.. e.g first time buyers, low income buyers etc. If you pick fruit off a tree because they are tempting and you do not water and nourish the tree then the roots of the tree will die. So simple !! Trouble is the greedy can only think about what is  just in front of their noses. . Greedy people may not suffer but their children and grand children might in the future.
18/01/2013 13:27
well its good news for property developers, alot of my customers (im a plasterer) are taking advantage and buying more houses and will be richer for it wen things pick up. people like myself whos homes have devalued and cant get enough cash for deposits are stuck though.
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Get the Bing Finance App for Windows 8 (© Microsoft)

more on msn money

msn money poll

New research has found that families are spending an average of £180 on back-to-school supplies for their kids. Does this tally with your experience?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

    14 %
    Yes, that sounds about right to me
    1,048 votes
    20 %
    Yes, but I think school supplies are getting more expensive every year
    1,380 votes
    29 %
    No, the cost of new uniforms, stationery and sports kit takes us well past the £200 mark
    2,003 votes
    37 %
    No, I wouldn’t spend anything like that amount on the little horrors!
    2,572 votes

Total Responses: 7,003
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.