How do we get more women in the boardroom?
Britain's biggest companies must soon set out the percentage of women they aim to have on their boards, as pressure builds to improve equality.
Britain's biggest businesses must outline plans to increase the number of women filling their top jobs by this month, as pressure grows to improve equality in the nation's boardrooms.
Research shows that just 12.5% of people on the boards at FTSE 100 companies are women. A government-sponsored review, published in February and led by Lord Mervyn Davies, has examined the reasons so few women make it to the top in UK business.
The report requires that, 'by September', all chairmen of FTSE 350 companies must have set out the percentage of women they aim to have on their boards in 2013 and 2015. Though the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) told us that there is no fixed deadline date for the announcement, FTSE 100 boards are expected to aim for one-in-four female representation by 2015.
Will quotas be needed?
At present there are no enforced quotas on businesses, but there is a possibility these will be imposed if firms fail to take sufficient voluntary steps to improve equality. Davies has called on UK companies to adopt a "comply or explain" approach, encouraging them to publish their own targets and comply with them or explain to shareholders why they have not done so.
David Cameron today made his views known on the issue, telling the Commons that the current number of women leading Britain's business was "simply not good enough" and that "positive action" may be required to address the imbalance.
And home secretary Theresa May today launched voluntary guidance for reporting on gender equality in the workplace. Speaking alongside the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), May urged businesses to publish pay information in an attempt to move toward earnings parity between men and women.
Other recommended targets
The issue of gender imbalances in British business is one that has been debated for years now, and the Davies report is not the only one calling for a larger percentage of women at the top.
Chief executives of some of the biggest UK companies, such as Centrica and John Lewis, have signed up to the '30% club', which aims to end the male domination of UK business culture.
Set up by Newton Investment Management CEO Helena Morrissey, the club - whose pledge is "growth through diversity" - aims to see women making up 30% of British boardrooms. To do so, it proposes a series of measures to 'balance your board', such as the introduction of flexible working arrangements.
Percentage of women at the top
According to the Cranfield School of Management, women held just 5.5% of executive directorships in 2010. These are typically the most senior and hands-on roles in companies, such as chief executives.
The institute says that women are more likely to be non-executive directors - external members on a company's board who are not involved in the day-to-day running of the firm. According to Cranfield, women held 15.6% of these non-executive positions last year.
FTSE 250 companies have an even lower proportion of female directors than FTSE 100 companies, at just 7.8%. Around half of the businesses in this group do not have any women in the boardroom at all.
By 26 August, only eight FTSE 100 companies had responded fully to the requirements in the Davies review, according to research from lawyers Pinsent Masons.
Of those that did, Centrica and M&S have said they already have 25% female representation in their boardrooms, while another 12 businesses had already met the recommended percentage. Furthermore, several of those yet to respond were already on course to meet the government's stated targets, the law firm said.
"A further 32 companies have between 15% and 25% women directors, which means that 46 of the FTSE 100 have already got to where Davies wanted them to be by the end of 2011," the report said.
"Of course, a percentage measurement is not always a fair reflection of what is happening as it inevitably depends on the total number of board members: Burberry, for example, has the best ratio in the FTSE 100 with 42.9%, achieved by having three women on a board of seven, while Prudential scores only 18.8% with the same number of women on a board of 16."
Pressure from the European Union
At present there is no legislation to force companies to adopt a certain quota of women in business, but pressure is mounting - as evidenced by the prime minister's words today.
This is partly because Europe is racing ahead of the UK when it comes to achieving equality in the boardroom. For instance, Norway already has a 40% requirement on corporate boards, and many other countries are also putting regulatory arrangements in place.
As a result, momentum is gathering among UK companies to get more women at the top. But rather than an arbitrary percentage, isn't it about injecting talent into businesses rather than a specific male-female quota?
The case for a balanced board
There is little doubt that, regardless of their sex, we need the best brains running our businesses - particularly during turbulent times - but research supports the argument for having more women at the top. The Davies review, for example, quoted studies demonstrating that companies with more women on their boards outperform their peers, with a 42% higher return on sales, 66% higher return on invested capital and 53% greater return on equity.
Jane Scott, UK director of the Professional Boards Forum, runs events to bring City chairmen together with professional women who may be potential boardroom candidates.
She says the Davies review and "30% club" targets are "a good way of shedding light on the need for more women in the boardroom, and a tool for companies to benchmark themselves against". But, she adds, "things could change more quickly given the depth of talent available to UK boards, and investors are starting to take the issue seriously as a diverse board makes better decisions than a homogeneous one."
While many in the investment community remain sceptical of specific targets when it comes to the number of women on boards, they feel there is certainly a case for more female-influence in general for Britain's companies.
Sir Roger Carr, chairman of Centrica, president of the CBI, and a supporter of the "30% club", says: "Boards are intellectually and socially enriched by the presence of women and consistently more effective through balanced judgement and opinion in decision-making."
Emma Howard Boyd, head of sustainable investment and governance at Jupiter, adds that women on boards are more likely to challenge on strategy and governance issues.
Women to control 'the bulk of Britain's wealth'
Michel Barnier, Europe's internal markets commissioner, earlier this year urged an end to the "group-think approach" of male-dominated boardrooms. In a draft directive he suggested imposing mandatory quotas to dictate the number of women sitting on bank boards.
Alongside this there's also a clear personal wealth argument. Employment and spending trends mean that women are poised to take control of the bulk of Britain's wealth, according to research from the Centre for Economics and Business Research.
In the UK, women are expected to own 60% of all personal wealth by 2025 - making them a vital part of the decision-making process of Britain's biggest companies. But whether businesses come to that realisation on their own, or whether they'll require a push from the state is something that is likely to cause yet further debate in the coming months and years.
"A government-sponsored review, published in February and led by Lord Mervyn Davies, has examined the reasons so few women make it to the top in UK business"
Perhaps because not many of them have what it takes to get there??
As a woman, I am a strong proponent of equality and women's advancement in all sectors, but only if they prove they can do the job. It has never been a good idea to have unqualified people in top positions just so we can meet quotas. This country is already being run by blithering idiots, now they tell us we have to have at least one in every boardroom as well. Great!
Why do women have to be forced into the boardroom? They should be there on merit and capability. Most women make their money preferring the bedroom to the boardroom by social contract. Women have had the opportunity for change - they blew it out for hangbags and shoes, the 4x4; nannies and cleaners most of whom are other women. Don't see anyone campaigning for the right to be in domestic service regardless of gender race or mobility etc.
They expect partners to do chores, child care, DIY, work 60 hours to pay for it all, not have a mistress or lover, do as he is told and get divorced when they have had enough taking the house and maintenance. Why work the boardroom?
Like said you get good women managers and bad. But like said again when they go bad they don`t know when to stop. I still remember one woman manageress who picked on men, put all blame on them for bad sales figures, mistakes, whatever and then sacked them. She picked on those who appeared weak.
I was very polite and she interpreted that as weakness and so decided to pick on me. Every else was too sh`t scared to stand up for themselves. Eventually I had it out with her in a very aggressive manly way when she picked on me again and fully expected to be sacked. But I didn`t care any more, I was that pissed off.
To my surprise I wasn`t and she never picked on me again.
Then she went to some other new boy and started the same on him. I tried to help him by advising he must stick up for himself, but he wouldn`t.
A month later he was sacked- And he hadn`t done anything wrong. I was disgusted.
So no one needs to tell me women are perfect in management, all many of them manage to do is climb up the ladder by being immoral c0ws to everyone else, usually men. They seem to think it`s ok if it`s especially men.
the problem of having women as bosses is they are very unpredictable!! They either like you or hate you !!! no in-between!!!! and you get way too much bitchyness.
That be said I have nothing against women being in charge !!! my opinion is if you boss asks you to do something you do it as long as its within you contract and pay grade.
It is a proven fact that women do not have a clue of what is going on around them. How can you have female directors who are not aware of what is going on around them? I have experience of them in the boardroom, in my own company and elsewhere. There are I admit a FEW good ones and those are really good but the vast majority are just floundering around with little direction.
Therefore it is a NO from me.
What a load of crap. Women this women that. Yep make em all bosses by government led legislation i am sure i would feel as respectful and look up to them by getting there via fair means and not getting any help, Just as i am sure there will be an outcry from all womens organisations how there gender are getting jobs through the back door.at the expense of the poor man. Through government led legislation. How long before us men have to be undermined to the degree where we as men are basic 2nd class citizens.
Smacks of what is happening in South Africa to redress the balance back to black, where everybody except a white male can get the job, NOT who is best qualified. Ever wondered wy so many White South African males are in Britain, Well now you know,What happened to the right person for the job, I would find it hard to take orders from anyone knowing they got there through foul means not fair which is what will happen if government are allowed to stick there noses in types of business as this any more than they have in the future. Women for the top jobs via effort and fair play all for it. Women for the top because government say so.........NEVER will agree to that
Please note that articles on MSN Money do not constitute regulated financial advice, which recommends a course of action based upon the specifics of your personal circumstances. The articles are intended to provide general personal financial information. We urge you to consult an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA) before making any important decisions about your finances. You can search for an IFA in your local area. Any statement regarding financial services products and tax liability is based on legislation and tax practices as at 6 April 2011, which is, of course, subject to change. The value of any tax benefits or reliefs depends upon the individual circumstances of the investor. When investment performance is mentioned you should remember that past performance is no guarantee of future performance. Where products have an underlying investment content, in many cases the value of the investment can fall as well as rise. For with-profit based investments, there is no guarantee as to the level of bonuses that will be declared, if any. Where mortgages or secured loans are explained do remember that your home is at risk if you do not keep up repayments on a mortgage or other loan secured on it. All mortgages are subject to underwriting, status and are not available to people under the age of 18.
New research has found that families are spending an average of £180 on back-to-school supplies for their kids. Does this tally with your experience?
Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results
- Yes, that sounds about right to me
- Yes, but I think school supplies are getting more expensive every year
- No, the cost of new uniforms, stationery and sports kit takes us well past the £200 mark
- No, I wouldn’t spend anything like that amount on the little horrors!