Updated: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:38:50 GMT

Are building societies better than banks?

Building societies have a better reputation, but do they offer better products?


Banks v building societies (© Image © PA Wire - AP)

You often hear people say that building societies are better than banks. After all, building societies are owned by their members, meaning that - in theory - they should make more of an effort to look after their customers.

However, 700,000 Nationwide Building Society customers were affected by an IT failure last week that saw them billed twice for transactions, so that raises the question: are building societies any different?

Let's start by looking at the basic differences between banks and building societies.

The big picture
The biggest difference is their ownership.

Banks are owned by shareholders and are normally listed on the stock market. A bank's primary purpose is to generate the maximum possible level of profits and then pay dividends to shareholders.

Building societies are owned by their customers - the 'members'. Supporters of building societies argue that the different ownership structure means that societies offer better products than banks and are less likely to rip off their customers.

Building societies also tend to raise less money from financial markets. If you're a mortgage lender, you need to obtain money to lend out from somewhere. The traditional approach is to raise money from savers by operating savings accounts. But lenders can also borrow from other banks and financial businesses via the financial markets.

Societies face tighter restrictions on how much they can borrow from the markets, and have generally taken a relatively low-risk approach to raising money for lending.

But that's not to say that building societies never take risks. Several societies ran into trouble during the financial crisis because they had made loans to higher-risk borrowers who were struggling to pay off their debts. Both Nationwide and Yorkshire building societies had to rescue some of their smaller counterparts.

The products
So those are the 'big picture' differences between banks and building societies, but it's also really important to look at individual products and see where you can get the best financial deals.

Let's start with the traditional mainstays of building societies - savings accounts and mortgages.

Savings
For many people, Cash ISAs are the best way to save because you don't have to pay any tax on your interest.

Here are the top-paying Cash ISAs right now.

 
AccountInterest rate (AER)Notice/termMinimum depositNotes
Halifax Five-Year ISA Saver Fixed4.15%Five-year bond£500 
Halifax Four-Year ISA Saver Fixed4.1%Four-year bond£500 
Santander Two-Year Fixed Rate Major ISA4%Two-year bond£1 
Santander Direct ISA (Issue 9)3.3%Instant access£2,500Includes 2.8% bonus for first 12 months
Coventry BS 60-Day Notice ISA3.25%60 days£1 

Although Halifax was once a building society, it's been a bank for 15 years and is now part of Lloyds. It's the clear leader in the Cash ISA market, and the building societies don't have any market-leaders in this sector.

And when it comes to conventional savings accounts, the building society products still aren't as strong as the bank ones.

For example, the highest paying five-year fixed-rate bond is the BLME Sharia Compliant Five-Year Premier DepositAccount. This account pays an 'anticipated profit rate' of 4.6% a year which no other account can beat. (As this account is Sharia compliant, it doesn't pay interest, but pays out anticipated profit instead.)

And if you don't fancy an Islamic account, the next best rate is still from a bank. The State Bank of India's five year bond pays 4.5% a year, ahead of any building society.

Mortgages
Comparing mortgages is always hard because there are so many factors to consider. There's the interest rate, the fees, the size of your deposit, and you also have to decide what kind of mortgage you want.

That said, we think it's pretty clear that the sexiest mortgages on the market come from HSBC and Santander. Both banks are offering five-year fixed-rate mortgages at 2.99%. You'll need a 40% deposit to get either mortgage, but this is an astonishingly low rate for such a long fixed term.

Of course, you may not want a fixed-rate mortgage and prefer to get a lower rate. In return for the lower (variable) rate, you take the risk that your interest payments could change at any time.

Leeds Building Society is currently offering a very attractive two-year discounted mortgage at 2.85%. The fees aren't too high, and you'll only need a 25% deposit to get this deal. Nationwide has also cut the rates on several top mortgages this week.

The Leeds two-year mortgage is probably the strongest building society loan. Looking at the mortgage market as a whole, we'd say this sector is a draw between banks and building societies.

Credit cards
In the credit card market, banks are the clear winners. Most of the top cards are offered by banks.

If you're looking to do a 0% balance transfer, Barclaycard is the clear top dog at the moment because it's charging very low fees for all its balance transfer cards.

So if you transfer your credit card debt to the Barclaycard 21-Month Platinum Visa card, you won't have to pay any interest for 21 months, and you'll only have to pay a 1.3% fee. That's much lower than typical balance transfer fees, which are normally around the 3% mark.

Meanwhile, Santander offers one of the best cashback cards. With its 123 credit card you can earn 3% back on your petrol spending up to a limit of £9 per month. However, you do have to pay a £2 monthly fee.

Banks win
So on the basis of this quick overview, banks do appear to have the stronger products overall. We'd stress that there are some strong building society products out there and things can change quickly as accounts and cards are frequently withdrawn and relaunched.

Still it's fair to say that if you conduct all your financial transactions with a building society, you will miss out on some strong deals. On the other hand, you'll get the satisfaction of supporting a mutual business that isn't owned by City institutions.

44Comments
30/07/2012 00:21
avatar

The thing that annoys me, as a Nationwide customer, is that in the past when I have accidentally gone over my available balance I have been charged £35 per unauthorised transaction.  I had 2 transactions taken, unauthorised, in this recent error but is there any mention of a £35 payment made to me by Nationwide for their unauthorised taking of my money?  No!

 

The rules have to be the same for both the customer and the business.  If we do wrong and you're going to charge us then when you do wrong you should be charged that same penalty fee.

 

30/07/2012 06:40
avatar

I see this item is sponsored by the Halifax.  I nice piece of unbiased reporting then!!

 

The fact remains that mutually owned building societies have a much superior culture i.e. a culture that is focused totally on providing great service and deals for members, whereas banks have to maximise profit for shareholders by treating customers as sources of income, which leads to the culture where banks go too far and get too greedy and hence all the banking scandals.

 

It is very simple really, do you want to deal with institutions whose only role is to work in your best interests or institutions where your needs are secondary to corporate greed?

 

This 'article' is weak attempt and will only appeal to customers who put greed before principle and therefore are happy to deal with their own kind.

avatar
They are all the same and there is no point pretending otherwise. I used to work for Nationwide and I hated it. In the interest of fairness I can only say that I suppose it might just have been my branch and not the whole company but somehow I doubt it. When interviewed for the job it was really hammered home how important customer service was to them and briefly mentioned that there were some "easy to reach sales targets". Within a week of starting I realised how wrong this was. We were expected to harrass every customer, bombard them with sales pitches but if they had a query that was not related to bringing in new business no-one wanted to help them. I was new and didn't know the answer to some things and one poor gentleman that phoned the branch waited a week for me to get someone to call him back because no-one wanted to waste their time on him because he wasn't going to contribute to their sales target.
30/07/2012 16:24
avatar

Bad as each other, put a cheque in after certain time weekday or weekend, wont start clearing process of 5 days until next working day, 5 days to clear a piece of paper, this is 2012, and not the 1600s

30/07/2012 06:12
avatar

NO THERE NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE OWNED BY BANKS ie HALIFAX WAS MINE NOW

LlOYDS TSB AND WE KNOW WHAT HAPPENED THERE CROOKS

30/07/2012 18:59
avatar

Big error in article! - not all building societies are owned by the customers! - only the "mutual" building societies are owned by the customers - the other building societies are owned by shareholders, just as with banks.  MSN should really use writers who know about a subject to write the articles on it, or at least get its writers to do careful research before writing articles!

avatar

For years my family banked with Trustee Savings Bank (TSB) but when they give up their 'small bank' status we all moved to the Halifax Buidling Society. Halifax was OK for while but then steadily went downhill and when it was merged into HBOS customer service became non-existent so the accounts went to Nationwide.

 

Sadly, Nationwide has also gone down the toilet over the past couple of years. I'm not sure how financial sound they are but the closure of numerous very busy smaller branches isn't exactly re-assuring. There are things you can't do over the phone or on their internet banking system and suddenly forcing loyal customers to make an extra 20-mile or longer round trip to visit the nearest branch isn't exactly the best way to keep people happy.

 

I'm now with Santander (the old Abbey National) and keeping my fingers crossed the good service I've had from them so far will continue.

 

As for the rest of them? In the past I've used business accounts with Lloyds, Barclays and NatWest - they are all just money-grabbing b*****ds looking for any excuse to hit you with charges. Barclays continued to deduct monthly loan insurance premiums (this was long before PPI) from my account even though they were paying out on the cover after an accident stopped me working for six months. NatWest cancelled an overdraft agreement without telling me then charged for writing the letter that said I was overdrawn.

30/07/2012 11:09
avatar

I would not trust money with either Banks or Building Societies..

FRIENDS LIFE ( formerly Friends Provident) virtually promised a return of £28K on my endowment mortgage.

Surprise surprise now that mortgage is nearing the end the return is likely to be less than half - approximately £13K.

I have written to FRIENDS LIFE and to cut a long story short their response is basically 'tough luck'.The man hours they spent (including a letter from the Director) dreaming up excuses for their poor performance could have contributed to some financial recompense. Poor returns are blamed on a poor performing market. It's very strange, however, that the poor performing market did not appear to disrupt their constant flow of bonuses.

Beware of all financial institutions especially FRIENDS LIFE. ( NO wonder they changed their name).

Who do you think pays for all their profits and bonuses?

Perhaps if they reduced their take of the profits then they could honour their promises and deliver a fair service.

At the moment they are a law unto themselves.  They milk the profits when the going is good and when there is a downturn in the market they can rely upon the taxpayer to bail them out.

People in the real world have to contend with realities of economics. If you fail to perform you don't get paid bonuses.

Come on you bankers (rhyming slang) try to survive on your six figure salaries and stop writing yourselves bonus cheques that the rest of us have to pay!

 

30/07/2012 16:10
avatar
There all as bad as each other...................Under the mattress sounds the best idea.sod um.
30/07/2012 12:24
avatar
RBS  will  get  a  fine  for  the  manipulation  of  Libor,  same  as  Barclays  i guess,
But  its  the  Government  who  have  really  manipulated  Libor  with  fixing  rates  as  low  as  they  have  and  robbing  savers  of  all  their  future..  for  what.  ???
the  banks   must  be  totally  busted, or   the  economy   would  be  improving  by  now,  
all  this  QE  must  have  gone  just  to  keep  these  busted  banks  going...
and  the  busted  government....  who  could  save  money  by   stopping  people  who  continually  rob  the  benefits  system  and  still  i  don't  see  any  saving  in  waste.
30/07/2012 09:01
avatar
I understand that banks building societies have to make profit but for who? defiantly not the customer who supplies the funds to make the Bank/Building work the only profit there interested in how much to pay shareholders and bonuses for themselves but I still cannot understand how a bank/building that went broke then revived with public money can still pay dividens to shareholders managers who must have lost everything when they went bust but no they still get their bonuses and we get a 0.1% return I must have gone to wrong School because 1and 1 doesn't make 2 according to the government and banking system, the school most of the these people must have gone to ICONUALL and ICANSTEALANDGETAWAYWITHIT Collage
17/08/2012 15:52
avatar
Lets all go back to being paid with a wage packet, all this rubbish started when banks took our money before it had even got into our hands. They spend it before we get the chance, then charge us for the privilege!!  
30/07/2012 19:47
avatar
I wish these stupid people could stop telling us how lonely they are. What has it got to do with the subject we are supposed to be commenting on!
30/07/2012 02:23
avatar

What a surprise.

 

All the news and you can only comment on this-shame on you MSN.

 

Oxford& transgenderd-crap!

 

Mitt romney -what a n00b.

 

what next? same-sex marriage for under12's?

What a sick society!Banks kiss your money goodbye.

 

avatar
I totally agree !! with the persons comment under me !! i banked with the halifax for 35 yrs and thought it was an ok till it merged into hbos and steadily itsgone down and down before my eyes [ customer service ] ahahaha your having a laugh ........what customer service ??? they dont give a toss !! infact all staff in branch dont give a toss in where i live and its so frustrating ..........they dont care ............but there fast enough to take there wages every month for not doing anything ......... verypoor service indeed ........................
30/07/2012 14:31
avatar
It's ironic that this piece of advertising is from the bunch of thieves that took money from us on a regular basis, i'e the halifax. We put our trust in them and regularly got money taken out on a basis we owed them money when we always had money in our account. When we paid off our mortgage with them and closed our account they still took money over and above what was agreed we owed on the morgage. They fired one financial adviser because he was trust worthy (rare in this age). So no to trusting building societies, especially HALIFAX.
30/07/2012 10:40
avatar
Sponsored by Halifax and some VERY convenient comparisons for the banks too... comparing a 5 year ISA bond requiring a minimum deposit of £500 to a 60 day notice account requiring 1/500th of that deposit - they can hardly be described as similar products or to target similar consumers. Equally the only ISA which has a shorter notice period than Coventry BS requires £2500 deposit and only gives 0.05% greater interest.

When it comes to credit cards the comparisons are interesting too - note that it's all about cashback and balance transfers not what the average consumer might pay for an ongoing credit card rate. A quick scout around the Nationwide and Barclaycard websites reveals that for those with an 'average' credit rating that the rate after the initial 0% period for a Barclaycard Gold Card is 19.9% while for the Nationwide credit card it is 15.9%. That's roughly a 20% difference... and perhaps where Barclaycard makes the money to be able to offer it's introductory deals in the first place?

While the article pushes bank products perhaps the author would have supported this argument more effectively if they actually compared equivalent products rather than cherry picking and comparing those  likely to appeal to different consumers or which are only available as short-term deals in order to make their point.

17/08/2012 11:27
avatar

Amazing to me that people still buy financial "products" of any sort. Recent history shows they don't perform & many people would have been better off just spending the money. Add to that 3, 4 or even 5 years lock-in when you're expected to keep paying in or lose & I'd say forget it.

We had a life insurance for 20 years which we struggled to pay & would have preferred to spend the money on our kids. It produced less than an instant access savings account. I'm told this was one of the better performing ones!  Better I suppose than my mother who invested with one of the big 4 banks who assisted a fraudster to (legally) steal all her savings so we had to pay her debts when she died.

The moral? AVOID AT ALL COSTS!

17/08/2012 17:03
avatar
In the UK there is no difference. They are both as good rip off merchants as each other
avatar
Building societies also raise cash on the money market. If they did not they would not have enoguh to lend to borrowers.
I worked for four or five in my  time and found them all as bad as banks, certainly in the later years

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of Conductplease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?

latest money videos

10 reasons to make MSN UK your homepage (© Microsoft)

more on msn money

msn money poll

When did you last switch your current account?

Thanks for being one of the first people to vote. Results will be available soon. Check for results

  1.  
    5 %
    In the last six months
    25 votes
  2.  
    3 %
    In the last year
    14 votes
  3.  
    5 %
    In the last two years
    21 votes
  4.  
    3 %
    In the last three years
    15 votes
  5.  
    10 %
    In the last five years
    46 votes
  6. 74 %
    I have never switched current accounts
    345 votes

Total Responses: 466
Not scientifically valid. Results are updated every minute.